Automation Platform
Activepieces review
Open-source, MIT-licensed automation with built-in AI agents and MCP
Pros
- MIT-licensed open-source core with the option to self-host on every plan, including free
- Run-based credits — one credit per run regardless of step count — makes non-AI workflows cheap to price
- Ships AI agents, chat-to-automation, tables, and MCP servers alongside the classic flow builder
- Embeddable, white-label builder SDK for products that want automation inside their own app
Cons
- Integration library (roughly 700+ 'pieces') is still smaller than Zapier's, though anything with an API works via HTTP/webhook steps
- AI steps on hosted models consume 2–20 credits each, so AI-heavy flows cost noticeably more unless you bring your own keys
- SOC 2 certification is still in progress, which may matter for compliance-sensitive buyers
- Governance features like audit logs, SCIM, and custom roles are reserved for the enterprise Ultimate tier
Our take
Activepieces is the open-source automation platform most often positioned as the friendlier sibling of n8n: it targets business users with a Zapier-like visual builder, but keeps an MIT license and lets you self-host on any plan, free included. Its recent pivot to run-based credits — a whole run costs one credit no matter how many steps — plus native AI agents, chat-to-automation, and MCP support make it a credible pick for teams that want AI-aware workflows without a heavy engineering investment. Where it still trails is integration breadth versus Zapier and depth of code-level control versus n8n, and its SOC 2 program isn't finished yet, so compliance-driven buyers should check that box before committing.
Best for
Teams that want an open-source Zapier alternative with a gentler learning curve than n8n
Pricing
Free tier with 100 credits/day; Plus from $16/month (billed yearly), Team $166/month; self-hosting available on every plan, Community Edition free under MIT
Visit Activepieces →