Coding Agent
Cursor review
AI-native code editor built for fast, in-flow pair programming
★★★★★ 4.7/5
Pros
- Deeply integrated into the editing experience rather than a bolt-on chat panel
- Fast iteration loop: inline edits, multi-file context, and agent mode in one place
- Large and growing user base means fast bug fixes and frequent model upgrades
- Works well both for small inline edits and larger agentic refactors
Cons
- Primarily built around a specific editor experience — less useful if your team is tied to another IDE
- Costs can add up for heavy usage on higher-tier plans
- Best results still require the developer to review and steer, not fully autonomous
Our take
Cursor took the approach of rebuilding the code editor around AI rather than adding AI to an existing one, and it shows in how naturally suggestions, multi-file edits, and agent-driven changes fit into the normal editing flow. It has become one of the fastest-growing developer tools in this category, appealing to engineers who want AI assistance without leaving their editor or learning a separate agent interface.
Best for
Developers who want AI assistance built into their primary editor, not a separate agent
Pricing
Free tier available; Pro plans start around $20/month
Visit Cursor →